32033401282508
Images Original Series 6-in. Boxerjock® Boxer Brief - 2 Pack
Top Rated
Hover to Zoom | Click to Enlarge

Under Armour® Original Series 6-in. Boxerjock® Boxer Brief - 2 Pack

Details
$35.00
Variations
Add to cart options
Product Actions
1
  • 1
Free Shipping on all orders over $49
We’re sorry, you have too many items in your shopping bag. To add this item to your bag, please remove previously added items.
The maximum purchase quantity of this item is 24.
We're sorry. This item is currently out of stock.
Additional Information
Featuring lightweight, smooth HeatGear® fabric and an articulated mesh fly panel, these boxers will be your most comfortable pair. Four-way stretch fabrication gives you greater mobility while maintaining shape, making them ideal for your most active days. • Set of two • 6-in. inseam • Elastic logo waistband, fly • Low rise • Moisture Transport System wicks sweat and dries quickly • Anti-odor technology prevents the growth of odor-causing microbes • Elastane, modal, polyester • Machine washable • Imported
  • Machine washable
  • Polyester
  • Import
Shipping Details
Shipping Details

Shipping your purchase is easy at belk.com. Depending on your shipping method and the destination of your package, you can expect it to arrive within 4-7 business days Shipping Information .

Return Details

Returns are easy at belk.com. Easy returns

Original Series 6-in. Boxerjock Boxer Brief - 2 Pack is rated 4.7 out of 5 by 24.
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Great, But What's Up With The Awful Tags? I ordered these for my teenage son, and everything about them is great except for the tags. I read all the reviews complaining about tags, and almost passed as a result, then thought "surely UA has fixed this by now". NOPE! Two tags on each pair; one a mile long. Seriously, UA? Your competitors went tagless over a decade ago. Time to join them in the 21st century. Tags are annoying, they itch, they look cheap, they run the risk of ripping the seam when you rip them off, and I would think the material makes them more expensive to manufacture. Start listening to your customers! Quality-wise and look-wise, my son is happy.
Date published: 2017-05-27
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Very comfortable and don't bunch up I have tried several brands of boxer-briefs over the past couple years. I was trying to find something that didn't have the uncomfortable seams that irritate my skin along with something lightweight. These UA boxer-briefs are the most comfortable thing I've ever worn. They are worth the little extra money for the quality and comfort. Skip the traditional cotton multipacks from other brands and go with UA. I bought the XXL since other brands XL don't seem to fit right. These are actually a little big so they don't see to run small like the shorts or shirts from UA sometimes do. Order the size you would expect to fit and they should.
Date published: 2017-04-02
Rated 4 out of 5 by from NORMALLY GREAT!!! I have nothing but UA underclothes. I will wear nothing else. HOWEVER, this time someone decided to put tags in the underwear. I've never seen tags before and it is a horrible idea. PLEASE REMOVE THEM. Also, I ordered a 2-pack and normally everything is perfect, but this time one pair is bigger than the other. Seriously UA?
Date published: 2016-10-21
Rated 5 out of 5 by from The Undeniable Truth These underwear are the best made on the planet. I can say I've worn only them for the last 9 years. About 9 years ago I got my first pair of boxerjoc and was amazed at how much thinner and breathable they were compared to other companies. I got tired of feeling like I was sweating from wearing compression underwear. Under armour hit a home run with these 6" boxerjocs. The first models I had lasted about 4 years or about 5000 hours, until the elastic failed. But since then, I have gotten the "red label" versions and they have not failed yet. I believe the elastic waste band was improved. I think the 6" is perfect as far as length goes, and will never change my underwear of choice. My wife used to joke that my under shirt and bottoms were more expensive than her entire outfit, but they have held up for so long that they are worth every penny. These underwear are undeniably the best out!
Date published: 2016-11-22
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Answer Found! Haven't been able to wear underwear at all due to lower back surgery and complications there of. I also have Type 1 diabetes, so I can't have friction rubs. These boxers were the answer to several problems: one, the waistband doesn't aggrevate nerve sensitivity in my lower back. I usually wear bottoms that are nearly falling off to avoid touch-sensitivity issue where I had surgery. Two, I take a diabetes medication which can cause genital yeast infections as a side effect. Because this product keeps you dry, I was able to stop an infection before medical treatment was necessary. Three, Under Armor makes this product in a 3XL which fits me perfectly. Most stores that carry Under Armor products in my area do not stock UA 3XL boxer briefs. I sincerely appreciate UA's commitment to produce larger sizes. When I can afford to buy more, I will definitely do so.
Date published: 2016-12-14
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Mostly excellent I had posted a similar review to this a little over a week ago, but it seems to have been tied up in moderation. Sorry if it shows up twice. I purchased two packs of these underwear earlier in the month as it was time to replace a good chunk of my underwear wardrobe. I already had a pair of this style and two pairs of Heat Gear that fit and work quite well. I like the working fly and especially like that the Original Series has the mesh crotch. I wound up ordering Midnight Navy (413) - not to be confused with Midnight Navy (412), which I did (my mistake, though maybe cleaner naming would be beneficial) - and Carbon Heather (091). Both pairs in the Midnight Navy pack fit great and the green pair from Carbon Heather fit great, however, the grey pair fit a half to a full size small. Now I have an expensive pair of underwear that I can't use or return because of inconsistent sizing, which is really disappointing. I will likely avoid ordering underwear from the site in the future and, if I buy more Under Armour boxers in the future, I will stick to brick and mortar stores to inspect prior to purchase.
Date published: 2016-07-28
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Made it right I love this product and already have over 15 pairs. Ordered two 2-packs and when they arrived the colors weren't what I had ordered. Called Under Armour and they immediately corrected the order. Excellent service from them!! Could not have been happier with their follow through. I am a big fan of Under Armour and this episode makes me an even bigger fan.
Date published: 2016-10-19
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Not bad. I bought these because I don't care for cotton undergarments,especially after wearing compression shorts as a base undergarment during workouts and now as everyday undergarments. The issue with compression shorts is they have no fly. So, I picked these up to try out. The material does a great job wicking away sweat and keeping my nether region cool and dry. It's no different than compression shorts. My only complaint is the 6 inch inseam is too short and bunches up a wee bit when sitting. I find myself having to inconspicuously pull the legs down when I stand up, unlike the 9 inch length of my compression shorts. Unfortunately, I did not see any underwear with 9 inch inseams WITH a working fly. And the Iso-Chill run the same price as most of UA compression shorts, but lacks a working fly, so it'd be pointless to purchase them when I can continue to wear the compression shorts instead. It would be nice to see UA construct this specific underwear with a 9 inch inseam and perhaps offer a compression version as well with a WORKING FLY.
Date published: 2016-06-16
  • y_2017, m_10, d_22, h_21
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.3
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_24
  • loc_en_US, sid_32033401282508, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_belknew
  • bvseo_sdk, dw_cartridge, 16.1.0, p_sdk_3.2.0
  • CLOUD, getContent, 33ms
  • reviews, product