Under Armour® The Original 6-in. BoxerJock Boxer Briefs

Add to cart options
Product Actions
  • color:Dark Orange-Overcast Grey
  • size: Size Chart
    • Selectsize
  • 1
    • 1
Free Shipping on all orders over $99
We’re sorry, you have too many items in your shopping bag. To add this item to your bag, please remove previously added items.
The maximum purchase quantity of this item is 24.
Check in-store availability:
Please select size above
Additional Information
These must-have briefs wick moisture to keep you cool, dry and light, no matter the occasion. Elevated by four-way stretch performance and anti-odor protection, these boxer briefs are ideal for your collection, and come with a tear-away tag for the ideal smooth and comfy finish.
  • 6-in. inseam
  • Elastic logo waistband, pouch fly
  • Slim fit
  • Solid pattern
  • Tear-away tag
  • Machine washable
  • Polyester
  • Import
Shipping Details
Shipping Details

Shipping your purchase is easy at belk.com. Depending on your shipping method and the destination of your package, you can expect it to arrive within 4-7 business days Shipping Information.

Return Details

Returns are easy at belk.com. Easy returns

The Original 6-in. BoxerJock Boxer Briefs is rated 4.2 out of 5 by 77.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from I never will wear regular underwear again! I have worn these for several years now and I never will wear regular underwear again. These are truly the most comfortable underwear that I have ever owned. They are perfect for everyday wear and transition perfectly from work to crossfit / gym. I have also worn them traveling around Europe and the US and they are perfect for traveling because they are lightweight, supportive, and quick drying. They provide perfect support and provide ventilation with the mesh fly area and do not ride up. My wife actually also wore some of these to prevent chafing on a hot day walking around Italy. Its weird to say- but I truly do love these underwear!
Date published: 2016-10-25
Rated 1 out of 5 by from They used to be great but they changed the fit for some reason! I bought my first pair of these 3 years ago and bought many more pairs afterwards because I liked them so much. I've always worn Larges and they were great but the last couple of times I've ordered I've had to return because the Larges are too tight on my legs now. This last time I saw them in the Outlet I decided to buy a few Large and a few X-Large. I'm still returning all of them because the Larges are still too tight in the legs and while the X-Larges fit my legs, the waist is super loose. This is so frustrating because I've absolutely loved these since I found them but it looks like I'm going to have to find another brand as a replacement if there is one.
Date published: 2017-10-06
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Liked the old ones better I have been wearing the Under Armour 6" Boxerjock for years now. It was great for hiking. They stopped chaffing and dried quickly. The issue is over the last few years they have changed. They feel tighter in the legs and looser in the waist. My size has not changed and the old ones still fit great. I have purchased several pairs hoping to find the older ones but no luck. They seem to be made "low rise" as they don't come up the waist far enough. They constantly slide down now causing "plumbers butt". If there are any old ones available I would like to find them. Why the change in design?
Date published: 2017-05-06
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Still the best. A note about TAGS I've tried lots of different $20 pairs of underwear and still come back to these again and again. I have about a dozen of these now. About the tags, I would appreciate if Under Armour would just get rid of the tags all together. Tip: Don't cut the tag! Tear it off. However, I agree that when tearing the tags off, you run the risk of tearing a seam. I would like it if they didn't sew in the tag into the integrity of the material and even used a different color thread just for the tag so you can just cut the thread. I've ripped a seam on one of my UA shirts tearing the tag off.
Date published: 2017-05-10
Rated 2 out of 5 by from TAGS!? Should have read the reviews... As others have previously reviewed, these come with a enormous tag on them that you must cut off, but as I have said about the shirts recently, even once the tag is off, it is on the hem and still leaves the edge of the tag. It scratches and is very uncomfortable and quite unnecessary! Why not just go tagless like all the other major underwear companies? I don't get it! I gave an extra star because other than the tag, they would be 5 star comfortable. They fit true to size. If they were tagless, I would have already cleaned out my underwear drawer and replaced with a pair of these in all colors. UA, please stop putting these tags on the hems of all your clothing, but if you must, please figure out a way the tags can completely rip off!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date published: 2016-11-04
Rated 1 out of 5 by from DISAPPOINTED Honestly, what are you guys doing, do your bosses read these reviews? I have worn both the original boxer jock 9" underwear and the polyester blend t shirts under my work uniform (police officer) for well, years and It has become part of my daily gear as much as my radio, badge, and firearm. But in an attempt to replace worn underwear and t shirts due to heavy Velcro straps from ballistic vests etc. that wear them out. I have discovered the replacements are completely inferior to the originals. The waists on the new underwear versions are so loose that they bunch up and are basically useless to me although my waist has remained the same size. The legs remain tight but the waist bands are so flimsy and are made with very poor quality materials its awful. I have read numerous reviews here and your responses are pre written automatic replies. Here is the question is Product development going to actually fix the ridiculous antiquated paper tag issue and the lose fit along with the poor quality materials or is this the evolution of the product forcing many to seek another company to send our money to?
Date published: 2017-06-19
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Awesome, but why the tags? Hey UA, what's up with the aggressive tags on new underwear? Even cheapo brands have figured out tagless underwear are the way to go. Sure, these are tear away but not completely. Very annoying! Tags aside, this product is awesome. I'm a fan of the mesh pouch, comfortable and cool. I have worn this style exclusively for years. My older pairs are still the best, with my most recent pairs not holding up as well. The website says these are new so hopefully these will throwback to the "originals". Either way, product is great and I highly recommend.
Date published: 2016-04-23
Rated 1 out of 5 by from What happened to this product? I have been wearing this particular style of underwear from Under Armour for years. I ordered multiple pairs anticipating that they would fit just as all of my others have in the past. I received the order, removed the annoying tags and one of the tags ripped the seam between the fabric and the waistband. Why are these white tags present??? The tags, even when ripped away as instructed, still rub the skin of my waist. These tags are superfluous and uncomfortable. Also, the waistband seems much more flimsy and loose than the underwear that I've ordered in the past. Unfortunately, I don't think that I can return the shorts because I stupidly removed the tags without trying on the underwear. I'm beyond disappointed and will not order this product again.
Date published: 2016-05-20
  • y_2018, m_2, d_19, h_22
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.7
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_77
  • loc_en_US, sid_32033401277238, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_belknew
  • bvseo_sdk, dw_cartridge, 16.1.0, p_sdk_3.2.0
  • CLOUD, getContent, 8ms
  • reviews, product